February 12, 2010: Photoshoot: 7 HQ Images from GQ Shoot »

Sorry, shoot’s been removed due to some unforeseen issues. Apparently they were from another fansite (yeek!) and we got a good griping out over it even though we didn’t know about it. No worries, when we can get another set they’ll be posted again. Thanks for understanding!

Just a heads up to everyone, we will be making an announcement later on regarding HQ and MQ photos, so please stay tuned.

BEFORE YOU COMMENT: Your Comment Disclaimer Here.

CLICK HERE TO COMMENT

Ander | 11:46 am

What an Anne fansite. You guys removed the tags from MY EXCLUSIVE (not yours as listed on categories)- my site is oh-anne.com. Baah, that’s not honest to say its your exclusive.. lol. so you remove my tags and put yours? I got the GQ shoot in UHQ first than anyone, even first that the magazine was out..

Faith | 10:18 am

That’s quite an accusation to make, don’t you think? First of all, why are you trolling our site searching for pics – to steal, maybe? Secondly, how the hell would anyone be able to remove your tags? They ruin the pictures – I might be handy with photoshop but I’m not *that* handy. Third, Nat said clicking “exclusive” was an accident, you can find these on photo forums. If they took your photos, that’s one thing, but don’t you dare accuse us of doing so. We never – NEVER – take images from other fansites, with or without tags, unlike some people. Maybe you take photos from other fansites, and think that everyone does because of it, but not everyone’s like that.

On top of that, let’s pretend for a second that you got them first (to be frank, that’s just stupid because I don’t care if you did I don’t remember us saying we got them first) but if you did get them first, what’s that got to do with anything? You having a photo shoot first doesn’t mean nobody else can have it, that’s ridiculous. This whole thing is ridiculous.

You could have emailed us and said, hey, I think those are my photos and we would have explained the situation and possibly even removed the photos, but you just had to spam us. All you’re doing is making yourself look petty.

Ander | 2:26 pm

L O L

I was looking for other Anne fansites to affiliate, so I googled “anne hathaway fan” and came acros this. Of course the pics are on forums, but still, they removed my tags (you can see “anne hathaway shoot -blah blah blah- CLEANED” as thread title), which is dishonest! Just compare pictures! on the original pic (on my site) there are some things you can’t appreciate in yours… I was so upset. sorry about my comment, but i would have emailed either nat or you if i found a contact info on the site.

Oh, and, i never steal pics, i have my own resources (check my site, please)!

Don’t pretend that you didn’t know tags were cleaned…

Faith | 4:51 pm

LOL is right, you accuse us of stealing photos then yell that you never steal pics when accused back? Look, you could have acted like an adult and you didn’t. You could have commented, even if not emailed, hey I think those are mine – we would have been happy to work with you but you *didn’t*. I’m sorry, I don’t know what to tell you, if you’re going to scream insults you’re going to get them back. No, I’m not going to your site, so just chill about that – I’m sure you get plenty of traffic without trying to garner it from us.

First of all, I didn’t download the photos from the forum, and once you started bitching I did look at one and no I don’t see your tag. I’m not saying it’s not there, I’m saying it’s an honest mistake if they are there. You need to calm down and stop pointing fingers, because this is ridiculous and it’s getting really old.

Do you have any idea how many shoots and photos we’ve passed on specifically because we know they came from elsewhere? We’re talking hundreds of photos, easily, over the years. Jesus, I wonder why we bother having policies like that when people not only steal from us (a LOT) but also come screaming their head off that we did it to them, when we did no such thing and would *never*. How about *you* stop trying to pretend that there was something done to you by us, don’t try to pretend you’re not being an asshole when you could have fixed a bad situation by not acting like a child. I’m not so upset by the fact that you commented, but by the fact that you not only accused us of something but are still doing so. I’ve had it with other webmasters, I really have, I swear to the gods.

Ander | 5:05 pm

Acting like a child was my fault, okay, i know, but you don’t know how much (money) I did spend on that shoot just to get it everywhere with my tags removed and not giving credit… I don’t care the fact that other fansites use it, the fact I mind about is fansites not crediting the original source. I know taking the shoot from somewhere and not knowing tags were removed was not your fault, but still, you could credit me now…

If you don’t believe tags were removed, check this:

http://i50.tinypic.com/e9yclt.jpg

Faith | 5:08 pm

No, I know how much money these things cost and I understand that you’re upset, all I wanted was to resolve this without freaking out. We’re more than happy to remove them, and we *would have* been happy to send people to your site to see them there – that isn’t a problem at all. I can’t see the tags, but honestly all you had to say was that you thought they were yours, there would have been no questions asked since these things sometimes happen.

Ander | 5:23 pm

I don’t believe you can’t see the difference between the original pic and the one which got tags removed! Crediting my site would be more than okay, I just want “credit: —” :/

Anyway, this is the fansites world… There are many sites who never give credit and others who still give credit… And this won’t change :(

Faith | 5:35 pm

I may just be looking at the wrong photo – as I said earlier, I did just look at one but you also have to understand that you’re already familiar with the tag so of course it’s easy for you to see it. I would appreciate it if you’d stop accusing me of just saying I don’t see the tag, though, as if I would ever.

I’d personally rather just remove the images, but it’s up to Natalie how to proceed so I’ll leave you two to it. I do have to say that I realize what sites are like, by myself I’ve been running fansites since the mid 1990s and it’s gotten insanely competitive the last 5 or 6 years. Personally, I refuse to compete (it wouldn’t get me a prize anyway, lol) – far as I’m concerned, everyone else can do their own thing.

Ander | 7:17 am

Ok, taking them down is okay! :)

Faith | 1:07 pm

If something like this happens again (not just with us, with other Anne sites), please at least try to remember that it may be a mistake. Freaking out like that doesn’t solve anything. ;)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Featured Video

Sponsors

Career

Projects

Valentine's Day1Valentine's Day
AS: Liz
STATUS: February 12, 2010
OFFICIAL | IMDB | PHOTOS
Alice in WonderlandAlice in Wonderland
AS: The White Queen
STATUS:March 5, 2010
OFFICIAL | IMDB | PHOTOS
Bride WarsBride Wars
AS:Emma Allen
STATUS:DVD/BlueRay
OFFICIAL | IMDB | PHOTOS

Appearances

Coming Soon
disclaimer

Hollywood Princess is NOT official. Ther site is in no way affiliated or linked with Anne, her management or anyone affiliated with her. We are not Anne, we do not know her, we can not pass on messages to her and we are not in contact with her. Ther website was created for entertainment value only. If there is any content on ther website that you feel violates your personal property/copyright, please let us know and it will be promptly re-credited or removed.

Images and information on ther site are not posted for commercial gain, and are used under the ยง 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Law 107. All images and information are property of their respectful owners. Ther site does not claim any copyrights, no infringement intended.

About This Site

Info

Owned: Natalie and Faith
Design: Poison Apples
Host: FSN - Privacy Policy
Since: November, 2006
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline